Is time disappearing from the universe?
Some of you may recall an article I wrote previously, about a theory that was proposed that said time isn’t an absolute part of the spacetime continuum, or the “fourth dimension,” which it is frequently referred to as — and that the natural world can better be described by removing that part of the equation and thinking of time as a numerical order of change instead. We received a lot of interesting responses to the article. Some of which, were very thought provoking . I wanted to follow up with another radical idea I recently read about that falls in the same category. Except this one postulates that time really is the fourth dimension and it may be disappearing from the universe entirely!
If you’ve been a follower of any number of physics related pages or websites, you’ve probably heard about dark energy — the mysterious “anti-gravitational” force that’s accelerating the expansion of the universe and driving the galaxies away from each other at an accelerated rate. Well, what if we’re looking at it backwards? What if the universe itself isn’t actually expanding an at ever increasing speed, but time is actually slowing down, where it will eventually cease to exist entirely?
Of course, the changes in our everyday life would be minuscule and unnoticeable from the human perspective, but much more visible (and easily measured) in the vastness of the cosmic arena. That’s exactly what the scientists who took part in this study are proposing, including notable names such as: Professor José Senovilla, Marc Mars and Raül Vera, who hail from the University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, and University of Salamanca in Spain. Not only is dark energy dismissed as being preposterous, but the very observation of the ‘accelerated’ expansion of the universe is nothing more than a detailed illusion. (The expansion itself isn’t the illusion, but the *accelerating* expansion part is.) The appearance of the acceleration is due to time gradually slowing, much in the same way a clock behaves when it is equipped with a dying battery.
“If time gradually slows, but we naively kept using our equations to derive the changes of the expansion with respect of ‘a standard flow of time’, then the simple models that we have constructed in our paper shows that an “effective accelerated rate of the expansion” takes place,” says those involved in publishing the paper.
Physicists have been tracking the movement of supernovae explosions seem within the confines of distant galaxies,, which are used to confirm the expansion of the universe is happening at an ever increasing speed. (Amongother things) Using the Doppler effect to see the red-shift in the wavelengths of light emitted from objects that are traveling away from us, astronomers are able to pinpoint and discern how quickly the universe is expanding. All objects shifted towards the red, longer-wavelength are steadily moving away, while objects shifted towards the bluer end of the electromagnetic spectrum are moving towards us (the Andromeda galaxy is an example of this, as it will collide with the Milky Way in an estimated 5 billion years). There’s one problem though — the accuracy of these measurements work under the assumption that time is invariable through all portions of the universe, which would have extreme implications if that were untrue.
So, what does this mean?
Basically, this theory suggests that the fourth dimension of the universe; time — is slowly degrading into a new spatial dimension. If this were the case, the distant stars we perceive as moving away from us at an ever increasing speed are merely giving off that impression that they are accelerating.
“Our calculations show that we would think that the expansion of the universe is accelerating,” says Prof Senovilla. “The theory bases it’s idea on one particular variant of superstring theory, in which our universe is confined to the surface of a membrane, or brane, floating in a higher-dimensional space, known as the “bulk”. In billions of years, time would cease to be time altogether.”
“Then everything will be frozen, like a snapshot of one instant, forever,” Senovilla told New Scientist magazine. “Our planet will be long gone by then.”
Interestingly enough, the idea isn’t entirely hogwash. According to the most accepted model of cosmology that aims to explain the inception of our universe, time itself (along with the other dimensions that comprise the entirety of space/time and all four dimensions) came into being during the big bang. Therefore, it can also disappear — which is just the reverse effect. No need to worry about it happening anytime soon though. In the event that there actually is something to this hypothesis, there is still quite a bit of time left (about five billion years) before the clock strikes midnight for the final time – leaving everything in the universe, including you and I, frozen in the vastness of space forever.
Credit: Jaime Trosper
Source Material:
“Is Time Slowing Down?”
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19626354.000
“Countdown to oblivion: Why time itself could end:”
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19513-countdown-to-oblivion-why-time-itself-could-end.html
“Time likely to end within 5 billion years, physicists calculate:”
http://phys.org/news205133042.html
Further Reading:
“Across the Universe: From Quarks to Quasar’s previous article about time being an illusion:”
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=351485278271221&set=a.313338668752549.73826.313312622088487&type=1&relevant_count=1
“Model describes universe with no big bang, no beginning, and no end:”
http://phys.org/news199591806.html

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Share by Email
Jan 14, 2013 @ 03:33:46
Time is NOT a Dimension! that doesn't make any sense! Time does NOT exist in every dimension and they go on eternally. Time also doesn't exist during a void when the poles shift. If time is slowing time it is because the earth is slowing down, might be ready to make a pole shift. a clock is man made. our structure of time is only in our reality. Would you like to some Information? or can you not accept it! Warning : You'll most likely have to use your right brain as well to understand this. The side of the brain that controls emotions. http://www.thespiritscience.net watch episodes 'Dimensions" and "Human History".
Jan 15, 2013 @ 16:48:44
now why would you be emo in a time like this?
Jan 15, 2013 @ 16:48:44
now why would you be emo in a time like this?
Jan 16, 2013 @ 06:48:22
"You'll most likely have to use your right brain as well to understand this. The side of the brain that controls emotions. " … Doesn't that mean that it's not logical nor has evidence to back it up? I don't think that's how science works.
Feb 01, 2013 @ 05:50:11
I believe infinity exists outside the physical world, as we know it, so this could be like a dimension. I doubt tine is just going away. I wouldn't say time is relative. We measure time, but things still happen and have before, during and after we're here. It may be possible for beings outside of time could interact with us at any time via electromagnetic disturbances, which could affect our ability to perceive what usually can't be seen, so we might possibly see UFOs, which could be spiritual beings and, very likely, evil ones.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:30:39
Scruffles Gloriousmotherufkcer Jehovah – not using your right brain for science takes an imperative role out of science…and I do believe she was merely being condescending…because she is right, we made time…it is irrelevant. PEACE TO ALL
Apr 22, 2013 @ 18:14:08
Lol the right brain you moron this is science
Jan 14, 2013 @ 04:07:08
I greatly appreciate this article and find it very interesting. But as a fellow educated person, I can tell that you're much more adept at science than English. I personally find it difficult to initially give creedence to an article when I see eight grammatical and spelling errors in the first paragraph. I respect the content of this article though, and I appreciate your willingness to share it. If you ever want an unpaid volunteer to edit your articles, please feel free to let me know. Kind regards!
Jan 14, 2013 @ 04:36:16
Point taken. We have an editor checking through our articles these days, but this is one of our older ones. Thanks for the constructive criticism though.
Jan 14, 2013 @ 04:41:17
Ahh, well good deal. I just stumbled upon this website for the first time tonight, and I love it. Thank you, and keep up the good work!
Jan 14, 2013 @ 13:52:01
But then, isn't it the message that counts, not the occasional grammar or spelling mistakes? As a person that has English as a second language I always lol at people who totally ignore the message of an article and get of on grammar and spelling mistakes. Yes we all should try to be "perfect" but it's just not happening. If you have a problem giving credence to a technical and science article because of some grammatical errors, then don't blame the article, blame your self for your hangups and start working on them.
Jan 14, 2013 @ 16:20:39
Well John, as I plainly stated already, the message of this article wasn't lost on me. For people who grew up in America and embrace the English language and know it inside out, they might like to see an educational article written properly. I was genuinely trying to offer editorial help, because I like this website. I don't think it's neccessarily productive for people to dismiss the content of something based solely on verbage technicallities. But people tend to be judgemental about things like that. If you can't even proofread your article, what may you have overlooked in your material? Just saying, academic articles should strive for excellence in all facets, so that judgemental people don't take you for a dumbass before they consider your argument.
Jan 28, 2013 @ 09:05:48
Well, I find grammatical and punctuation and spelling errors as huge distractions, making me oftentimes stop reading something of importance. It's just TOO bothersome… and annoying.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 11:37:08
I get around 'em pretty well, grammatical mistakes. I do appreciate precision in all realms and I think it helps especially in scientific explanations like this where it can be so counter-intuitive that I have to re-read what I've read to see if I really read what it says. cheers.
Mar 11, 2013 @ 20:33:29
If you express well, then grammatical mistakes are not important. But in this article I don't think you did great in expressing this abstract ideas, I see there's lack of content and explanations about some concepts. I mean, I see two different hypothesis about the cosmological principle, but you don't mark well the difference between both and what makes some people go behind one or the other (explained experimental evidence above all). Why is time disappearing and what made this scientist reach to that conclusion? I think this question remains unanswered in this article.
Jan 14, 2013 @ 04:24:52
Time is degrading INTO a new spacial dimension? Does that mean that as time slows, we gradually experience more of this new 4th spacial dimension?
Jan 14, 2013 @ 05:31:33
Uhm… No! Think of it this way. Some massive objects produce ripples in the space-time continuum. You can't feel those ripples even if you wanted to, because the very space you exist in, expands and contracts. The same with time. You will perceive the same amount of time, you'll react the same way and nothing will seem out of the ordinary. Except, when you look out, to another place in the Universe with a different passage of time, well, you'll notice things moving very fast or very slow. This happens on day to day basis even right now. We live on Earth and the Earth has gravity. Gravity slows down time, so time passes a bit slower here then in the outer space. But not only gravity slows down time, speed also does that. The faster you go, the slower the time passes. If you reach the speed of light, the time will stop altogether. For example, for photons, no time passes at all. From our point of view, they wizz very fast across the Universe, but from the photon's point of view, they move instantly across the Universe. I hope you understand.
Jan 14, 2013 @ 05:45:16
What I mean is: Since time may be degrading into a NEW spacial dimension, does this mean a new spacial dimension is emerging in our universe as time degrades? It seems like that is what is meant. If that is so, how might this new spacial dimension be measured?
Jan 17, 2013 @ 01:27:38
maybe we are experiencing time as a 4th dimension from a 3rd dimension plane and therefore are only experiencing time in a certain way, such as 2nd dimensional beings would only interpret 3rd dimensional beings as 2d even though they arent?
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:43:29
Daniel, why do you say it slows time? Isn't it more accurate to say change slows?
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:43:29
Daniel, why do you say it slows time? Isn't it more accurate to say change slows?
Feb 23, 2013 @ 15:52:47
that would be interesting LOL
Jan 14, 2013 @ 05:33:47
So I'm not the only one with crazy ideas about time. This is worth investigating.
Jan 23, 2013 @ 19:49:00
isn't that what they predicted abt Dec 21 2012…. we'd be moving into a new dimension (and not a total destruction of the earth).
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:42:04
wow…never heard that…
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:42:04
wow…never heard that…
Jan 14, 2013 @ 08:29:34
Can we turn this into an SAT math question? Just sayin'…
Jan 14, 2013 @ 09:13:07
If time plays a big role in the expansion of the universe then it cannot be on one particular dimension….it would be in all. Our perception and our current technology cannot measure time they way it should measured.
Jan 14, 2013 @ 13:47:12
Time is a human concept it is an assumption that we came up with simple because we have no information to the contrary. As "time" goes by and we gather more knowledge we will find that many of our limited ways to understand the universe have to be revised. Einstein and any other great thinker and scientist are only "brilliant"" until we get more information and someone else comes up with a better explanation. If we become stuck with the old explanation and never look for new ways to explain the universe we will just as the worlds religions become stuck in the past without future.
Jan 15, 2013 @ 13:36:00
sacred geometry explains it all
Jan 14, 2013 @ 14:58:12
We as a human race are only on our 2nd level of consciousness. The secrets to the universe cannot be measured by what we see and touch, but instead think in terms of frequency, vibration and and sound.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:32:34
another well thought out and well presented post that I agree whole heartedly with
Apr 22, 2013 @ 18:20:03
"The secrets to the universe cannot be measured in what we see , but instead think in terms of frequency, vibration and and sound." so we dont see/hear vibrations and frequencies ? and feel solidity of matter by a vibrational energy heat?…
Jan 15, 2013 @ 11:29:55
I honestly don't think time will ever stop since we are the ones who created it. And I also don't believe time is the forth dimension since that would mean we've created a 4th dimension system in our dimension, and that would mean we are actually smart, although we are not smart enough to intertwine dimensions… Yet.
Jan 15, 2013 @ 11:29:55
I honestly don't think time will ever stop since we are the ones who created it. And I also don't believe time is the forth dimension since that would mean we've created a 4th dimension system in our dimension, and that would mean we are actually smart, although we are not smart enough to intertwine dimensions… Yet.
Jan 23, 2013 @ 03:51:26
is this because the mass of the universe is increasing and slowing time?
Jan 23, 2013 @ 05:31:04
time is only a relative component and mere everyday term for entropy. At speed of light, it is entropy that becomes zero and thus time stops. Time is relevant. Time on Mars means the rotational speed and orbital speed of mars. A year on mars would be a lot longer than the year on earth but does that mean it is relevant to our selves? An average life of 50 earth years would not be martian 50 years also. The author is right in a sense that since equilibrium is a fundemental quality of nature, all systems reset towards equilbrium leading to maximum entropy. In other words, after many MANY billions of years if universe keep spending, everything will reach same temperature of absolute zero thus rendering whole universe trully "dull" and "cold".
Jan 23, 2013 @ 14:41:51
at speeds close to the speed of light it's your mass that distorts time and basically it's preventing you from going the speed of light, a year on mars isn't a lot longer because time itself flows a lot different, it's because it has a larger orbit around the sun, though the mass doesn't distort time on earth (which is larger) it's only fractions of a second different over days and time distortion between the two planets is a minuscule amount. 50 mars years would be a lot longer than 50 earth years but that's because a mars year is 687 days, not because the time flow is drastically different
Jan 29, 2013 @ 15:03:52
how is it that mass can distort time? a body at stellar scale can distort time via gravitational effects but at near to C speeds, i was talking about relativistic effects targeting the entropy of a system. Time is only describe in science as a vector of entropy(in thermodynamics) so increasing entropy means larger time but that is the beauty of relativity. Everything is apparently related. Every motion is relative.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 05:37:33
How can time be relevant? We made time…isn't it possible that "time" doesn't stop, it just becomes non-perceptible? or it is finally shown in its irrelevant state? just some thoughts…I am severely undereducated, but working on it daily. ;p
Feb 23, 2013 @ 19:38:06
einstein theory of relativity
… higher gravitational fields have slower time… that is why time stops beyond event horizon(neglecting effects of tidal force) … it took me long to understand time in terms of physics and not just an everyday term
Jan 29, 2013 @ 06:46:42
OK, I suppose this is obvious (and yes, I will go read the sources), but I will ask it anyway since I didn't see it mentioned, what about the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?
–Ken
Jan 29, 2013 @ 09:43:45
I have ALWAYS thought this. I did not so much look at it from the view of time, but from the angle of "if everything is contracting and the closer you get to the center of the universe, the faster it is contracting, then from where you sit, both sides will appear to be expanding away from you even though all three of you (the point nearer the center, you, and the point father than you from the center) are all contracting. this article would be a correlation since time closer to the center of the universe must by definition slow down. vindication!
Feb 03, 2013 @ 04:47:32
Yes! Time is related to entropy and is slowing. I would speculate that with variable time, the universe would oscillate.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 06:22:05
Wouldn't it be weird if it weren't that things are getting farther away or closer, but that our whole universe was moving at one speed and has now changed to a different speed, altering the rate of change and our perception of the shape of our universe? Or perhaps the universe STARTED moving forward at a faster rate…that would explain the appearance of things being farther away.
Feb 23, 2013 @ 15:38:47
Time is non-linear and nice try on string theory (branes) but you have to prove string theory first before determining that the universe is indeed "gone".
Feb 24, 2013 @ 15:01:54
In my opinion the problem as I see it today, is humans insist there is such a thing as time.
Time is nothing but a human attribute. When the consciousness attaches itself to the human fetus it forms a conscious human brain which is where time has it's beginning, otherwise known as a camouflage reality. Time as we know it, past, present and future, does not exist. Linear time, past, present and future only exists in our human brain, period.
“All That Is” is created in the moment, the 'Spacious Present'. The moment of creation is continuous and never ending in the present, thereby continuously changing the past, present and future.
When you leave the human brain, you will no longer require the term known as time. You will no longer require a camouflaged reality. You will immediately experience true reality and all the questions about space, time and the universe will dissolve.
Oh, and yes the Universe is expanding but has nothing to do with 'Linear Time' (Cause and effect).
Feb 24, 2013 @ 17:26:19
has it always been expanding? why would it start suddenly? an outside force pushing or pulling?
Mar 11, 2013 @ 20:30:24
Time isn't degrading. It's being perpetually folded.
How can scientists assume that time is constant?
You are all retarded.
Mar 21, 2013 @ 09:34:09
Dark matter (according to my "sight") is the deepest bass there is…There is this ancient concept which nowadays science probably would have issues in giving it a whirl…"Fiat Creador"…Think of words as symbols…not facts.
Mar 21, 2013 @ 17:43:56
Time is a dimension, it is just our experience and the perspective we got that let the most of us not understand what time is. The most humans think that time is an unidirectional flow but that also only result of the experience of time and the perspective. Time is an endless flow in both directions and can also stand still.
Time will never disappear from our universe as the time was build long before the first or primal system,
the particle the nature is build from. Time is other in every dimension and in other dimensions another time exists. The big bang in example has happend in the past, happens now and will happens in the future.
To understand this we have to understand infinity.
I am working on a formula to describe these primal system and came out with the equation of time.
You can think I am crazy or what ever you want, as far as I am now I can calculate from these particle up to the human dna by using my formula as my formula exist now.
Another evidence of the model-idea I have from my particlesystem is that I can see it every where in the nature, equals if I look into space, plants, or humans or where ever I look at.
And you don't have to user your right hemisphere of your brain to understand this, you have to use.
both hemispheres at the same time in the most ballanced condition you are able to and you have to use as much of your brain as possible.
Every discussion about this is highly appreciated.
/bin
Mar 21, 2013 @ 18:00:47
First of all I apologize because I am a naval architect so I do not have formulaic language to explain my experiences. To follow what I've seen you have to understand the whole as sound. Light and matter as a range in "sound" spectrum. It is the wave, and the frequency range of that portion of the wave what comes to existence as dark matter (deepest bass we have been able to distinguish) or quantum electrodynamics (reverberation at very high pitches)…It may sound foolish but try giving it a whirl…¿Time? specific frequency band.
Mar 21, 2013 @ 18:05:23
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=79961979304&set=a.17786314304.2989.543284304&type=3&theater
limits being 0 and 9 this is from 1 to 5 (matter as we know happens between 4 and 5)
Came to me staring at my white wall…
Mar 21, 2013 @ 22:05:42
Sorry, but my mind is others and I am other, I just hear what nature is talking to me and I cannot invent something only discover or more specific rediscover as all already exist in nature. Light in example is a particle an a wave. And your brain or better your whole system human is the only thing that have the abillity to see and experience the truth. Because I am other I can see the things other. We humans are not what our brains make out of the information that it receive from the eyes. We are not more or less than a collection of energy.
If I am wrong please tell me but I can explain with my formula why the anti-neutrino that meet with the w-boson which is detached in beta-decay when one neutron is becomming a proton must be travelling backwards in time. If you can explain that to me from your perspective, you will got the possibility to change my thinking.
Mar 21, 2013 @ 22:06:12
we have to close our eyes to be able to see the truth
Mar 21, 2013 @ 22:26:54
I "was" reading with interest till I got to the comment about "…space time…" and then "HAD TO" stop reading when I got to "…dark matter…"
C'mon, people…will we ever get past these "defunct" ideas? "Global Warming"…"Big Bang!"…"Darwinism"…etc., what do they all have in common? They aren't based on FACTS! duh!
Mar 21, 2013 @ 23:15:38
@Robert Wise
The thing is that nothing is a fact or better only is a fact for a temporal period.
The people in the past in example have described the earth as a disc.
When we consider that at this time there was only one continent which also fits
with the idea and rules of my imaginary particle they where right at this time.
Also I can explain the big bang, but it is nothing that has happend only in the past,
it is still happening and will ever be happens. Free your mind and understand infinity.
Only because we cannot see these facts anymore does not means that they are wrong.
Facts are based on a specific coordinat in space and time.
We stop when our brain reach the limit of the understanding. The only thing that is impossible is the word impossible itself.
Apr 28, 2013 @ 13:11:26
Brittany? How does time cease to exist? That would stop stuff from happening, if it ceased to exist it would not exist again