Top 10 Countries That Disappeared In The 20th Century
10. East Germany, 1949-1990

Created from the Soviet controlled sector of Germany after the Second World War, East Germany was probably best known for its Wall and its tendency to shoot people who attempted to cross over it. Now, it’s one (over-reactionary) thing to shoot foreigners who are trying to enter your country illegally, but these were its own people!
Basically little more than a Soviet satellite state, the collapse of the notorious Wall and, with it, the demise of the old Soviet Union brought an end to this failed experiment in Communism, and it was integrated back into the rest of Germany in 1990. Because East Germany was so far behind the rest of Germany economically, however, its reintegration with the west almost bankrupted Germany. Today, however, things are swimming along nicely, thank you.
9. Czechoslovakia, 1918-1992

Forged from the remnants of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire, during its brief existence it was one of the few bright spots in Europe, managing to maintain one of the continent’s few working democracies prior to the Second World War. Betrayed by England and France in 1938 at Munich, by March of 1939 it had been completely occupied by Germany, and vanished off the map. Later it was occupied by the Soviets, who turned it into another vassal state of the old Soviet Union until that nation’s collapse in 1991. At that time, it finally reestablished itself as a vibrant democracy.
That should have been the end of the story, and probably would have been, had not the ethnic Slavs in the eastern half of the country demanded their own independent state, breaking Czechoslovakia in two in 1992. Today, it exists as the Czech Republic in the west, and the nation of Slovakia in the east, making Czechoslovakia no more. Though considering that the Czech Republic maintains one of the more vibrant economies in Europe, the far-less-well-off Slovakia maybe should have reconsidered.
8. Yugoslavia, 1918-1992

Like Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia was a by-product of the breakup of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire in the aftermath of WWI. Basically made up of parts of Hungary and the original state of Serbia, it unfortunately did not follow Czechoslovakia’s more enlightened example. Instead, it maintained a somewhat-autocratic monarchy until the Nazis invaded the country in 1941, after which it became a German possession. With the collapse of the Nazis in 1945, Yugoslavia somehow managed to avoid Soviet occupation but not Communism, coming under the socialist dictatorship of Marshal Josip Tito, the leader of the partisan Army during WWII. It remained a nonaligned authoritarian socialist republic until 1992, when internal tensions and rival nationalism resulted in civil war. The country then split into six smaller nations (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia, and Montenegro,) making it a textbookexample of what happens when cultural, ethnic, and religious assimilation fails.
7. Austro-Hungary, 1867-1918

While all of the countries that found themselves on the losing side after the First World War suffered economically, and geographically to some degree, none lost more than the once-powerful Austro-Hungarian Empire, which found itself carved up like a Thanksgiving Day turkey in a homeless shelter. Out of the dissolution of the once-massive empire came the modern countries of Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia, with parts of it going to Italy, Poland, and Romania.
So why did it break apart when its neighbor, Germany did not? Because it lacked a common identity and language, and was instead home to various ethnic and religious groups, most of whom had little to do with each other…to put it mildly. In effect, it suffered a large-scale version of what Yugoslavia suffered, when it saw itself similarly torn apart by nationalistic fervor. The difference was that Austro-Hungary was carved up by the victors in WWI, whereas Yugoslavia’s dissolution was internal and spontaneous.
6. Tibet, 1913-1951

While the land known as Tibet has been around for over a thousand years, it wasn’t until 1913 that it managed become an independent country. Under the peaceful tutelage of a chain of Dalai Lamas, it finally ran afoul of Communist China in 1951 and was occupied by Mao’s forces, thus ending its brief foray as a sovereign nation. China occupied an increasingly-tense Tibet throughout the ’50s until the country finally rebelled in 1959, which resulted in China’s annexation of the region and the dissolution of the Tibetan government. This finished the nation for good and turned it into a “region,” rather than a country. Today it remains a big tourist attraction for the Chinese government, though it still has issues with Beijing, by insisting it be granted its independence once again.
5. South Vietnam, 1955-1975

Created from the forceful expulsion of the French from Indo-China in 1954, someone decided it would be a good idea to split Vietnam in two, roughly at the 17th parallel, leaving a Communist north and a pseudo-democratic south. As with Korea before, it didn’t work any better in Vietnam, resulting in intermittent warfare between the two halves that ultimately dragged the United States into a conflict (again with the Korea comparisons,) that was to result in one of the most draining and costly wars in American history. Finally hounded out of the country by dissent at home, America left South Vietnam to fend for itself in 1973, which it did for only two more years, before the Soviet-backed North finally rolled over the country, bringing an end to South Vietnam and renaming Saigon—its capitol—Ho Chi Minh City. It’s been a socialist utopia ever since.
4. United Arab Republic, 1958-1971

In yet another ill-fated attempt to bring unity to the Arab world, Egypt’s fiery socialist president, Gamel Abdel Nasser, thought it would be a splendid idea to unite with his distant neighbor, Syria, in an alliance that would effectively surround their sworn enemy, Israel, and make them a regional superpower. Thus was created the short-lived U.A.R., an experiment that was doomed to failure almost from the start. Being several hundred miles apart made creating a central government almost impossible, while Syria and Egypt never could quite agree on what constituted national priorities.
The problem might have been rectified had Syria and Egypt managed to link their halves together by destroying Israel, but that nasty Six Days War came along in 1967, dashing their plans for a common border, and handing both halves of the U.A.R. a defeat of biblical proportions. After that the merger’s days were numbered, and finally came to an anti-climactic end with the death of Nasser in 1970. Without the charismatic Egyptian President around to hold the fragile alliance together, the U.A.R. quickly dissolved, restoring the nations of Egypt and Syria once again.
3. Ottoman Empire, 1299-1922

One of the great empires in history, the Ottoman Empire finally came to an end in November of 1922, after a pretty respectable run of over six hundred years. Once extending from Morocco to the Persian Gulf, and from Sudan to as far north as Hungary, its demise was a slow process of dissolution over many centuries until, by the dawn of the 20th century, it was but a shadow of its former self.
But even then, it was still the main power broker in the Middle East and North Africa, and might still be that way today had it not chosen to ally itself with the losing side in World War I. It saw itself dismantled in the aftermath, with the biggest chunk of it (Egypt, Sudan, and Palestine) going to England. By 1922 it had outlived its usefulness, and finally died when the Turks won their war of independence in 1922 and abolished the Sultanate, creating the modern-day nation of Turkey in the process. Still, you’ve got to give it credit for making such an impressive run before giving up the ghost.
2. Sikkim, 8th century CE-1975

What? You’ve never heard of the place? What rock have you been hiding under? Seriously, it’s not likely you would have heard of tiny, land-locked Sikkim, nestled securely in the Himalayan Mountains between India and Tibet…er, China. About the size of a hot dog stand, it was basically one of those little-known, and largely forgotten, little monarchies that managed to hold on into the twentieth century before it finally realized it had no particularly good reason for being independent, and decided to merge with modern India in 1975.
Its coolest claim to fame? Though just a little bigger than Rhode Island, it has no fewer than eleven official languages, which must play havoc with traffic signs—assuming, that is, that they have any roads.
1. Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (Soviet Union), 1922-1991

What would the 20th century have been without the good ‘ol USSR to stir things up? One of the truly scary counties on the planet until its anticlimactic collapse in 1991, for seven decades it stood as the bulwark of Marxist Stalinism, with all the misfortune that brought with it. It was created in the chaotic aftermath of the breakup of Imperial Russia after WWI, and both survived and thrived despite inept economic policies and brutal leadership. The USSR actually managed to beat the Nazis when no one thought that Hitlercould be stopped, enslaved eastern Europe for over forty years, instigated the Korean War in 1950, and very nearly got into a shooting war with the United States over Cuba in 1962, making its tenor on the world stage nothing if not eventful.
Finally coming apart in the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989, and the subsequent collapse of Communism in eastern Europe, it broke into no fewer than fifteen sovereign countries, creating the largest new block of countries since the breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918. What followed was the pseudo-democratic Republic of Russia, though it still retains much of the autocratic air it has always been famous for.
Want more “top 10″ – visit: toptenz.net


Share by Email
Feb 14, 2013 @ 15:30:19
I am not a yugo nostalgic person because I was born in 1992., but I must say this. I'd rather live in that period than today in "democratic" Republic of Croatia where a man can only achieve something by kinship, bribery and corruption. When my parents were my age, they both had a job, a decent salary, they could afford going on vacation, buy a pair of jeans and shoes when they needed them. And what do I have? I have the right to vote, speak, do whatever I wan't but on the other hand, I can't get a job, therefore I am living with my family, send resumes to companies I already know won't hire me because there is some other person that is right for the job (usually a family member of someone on higher position in that firm). Many will say, it's a global thing I know, but that means that this system is not working, and the one before that was better..
Feb 14, 2013 @ 16:04:52
Same here in Poland,
Post-soviet countries are often influenced by the russian goverment. so the label changes but leaders dont. unless they die… unfortunatelly there's a big line of an commie ancestors who just wait to take the seat and continue ripping post-soviet countries apart, so the mother RUSSIA is safe.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 18:10:38
I twice older then Petra,and I agree with her. I lived in those old times i USSR I'm Russian The education and medicine was completely free,people much richer in soul way,could invite complete stranger in a house for overnight ,kids where safe (been using public transportation alone since 6 y.o)Have to mention non of my relatives ever been communists .Now its turning to Western way: consume,screw others buy more shit and die
Feb 15, 2013 @ 01:13:24
Welcome to The New World Order Petra. Canada is doing the same things. It is scary We can sustain on our own but Free Trade not Fair trade are destroying our economies. Laka Nowitz.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 01:19:07
Andrey Atl Debt and more Debt bankers collect INTEREST and middle class is systematically being destroyed.Money is the root of all evil.Human kindness is the key to beating this.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 01:25:17
That is happening in Portugal too. Its a global thing and in my honest view, it's a planned system. Your debt (huge debt that didn't came out of my or your pocket) is where a good few people, ''high in the chain of command'', get their power. And their money, even tho they have enough to even barbecue money.
I actually commented on this because i think you guys are thinking wrongly about this and need to open your minds a bit and stop living in the past. Here in Portugal, people also talk about a time when Salazar (a dictator) was calling the shots and there was order and jobs, but in the end they couldn't talk about anything that could be of a trouble to the government (and that was almost everything, specially art) and all that crap that involves dictatorship, and i think people are forgetful of those things, of the bad side of those events and those governments. Also, i think we could have a brighter future, instead of going back into an old ''system''. I think it's all about unity and actually kicking out the people who are screwing me, you and entire population with a ''made-up debt'' and a cyclic system where we are slaves to consumerism and in some form, a kind of mass laborers, that most don't enjoy what they are doing and are doing it for survival. The tools for that change already exist, i think it's a question of changing mentalities and waking up to the need of change. But mentalities take time.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 01:32:57
<3 YUGOSLAVIA <3
Feb 15, 2013 @ 02:12:59
Well said.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 04:26:15
In Brazil we had a right-wing military dictatorship from 1964 to 1985, and specially harsh from 1968 to 1979. No freedom, but ordinary life was felt as better by almost everyone who lived the period.Then, of course, the problems we live now were being created and just exploded later, as we did not get rid of the bastards who ruled us: they just changed some faces, names, put up a "free press" that publishes only what they want and some elections only money can win. But it worked: no one protests any more; after all, we're "free". Democracy became the ultimate Ponzi scheme…
Feb 15, 2013 @ 07:19:14
I think that the answer to some of our problems is three-fold (at least from my perspective in the United States where we are beginning to look like what Claudio just described in Brazil). First extend terms so that if a politician has to make a difficult decision, we won't have to run for re-election until the people can see it play out. Second heavily limit the money that can be spent on a campaign and require that all political ads must be run by an official campaign team. Third impose very short term limits, possibly just one term so that politicians don't have as much incentive to do the biddings of special interests for re-election money. Just as a thought we have to be careful how we define right/left wing, I find that most politicians now are right wing, even those that claim to be liberal, they are all authoritarian in some measure. The only three I would say that are true liberals/left wing politicians in the United States right now are Joe Lieberman, Rand Paul, and Scott Brown now that Ron Paul has left Congress.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 22:17:24
Claudio Marcelo Silva
you really hit the nail in the head, Claudio – they are the same corrupted criminalized politicians, who just changed political "colors" and rhetorics, so that power and control over economy and politics never slip through their greedy claws ! In case of Yugoslavia communists became right-wing nationalists over night, and these same bastards then instigated bloody war which resulted with concentration camps and genocide, and all that just to preserve power and control !
Feb 15, 2013 @ 22:17:24
Claudio Marcelo Silva
you really hit the nail in the head, Claudio – they are the same corrupted criminalized politicians, who just changed political "colors" and rhetorics, so that power and control over economy and politics never slip through their greedy claws ! In case of Yugoslavia communists became right-wing nationalists over night, and these same bastards then instigated bloody war which resulted with concentration camps and genocide, and all that just to preserve power and control !
Feb 16, 2013 @ 08:33:13
you look nice though..
Feb 18, 2013 @ 14:54:20
Everyone complaining, learn CS 6-8 hours a day for the next 6 months and at least you can get a job from a start-up in Silicon Valley or elsewhere in the world. Do this well enough and you could potentially rake in 8-10K a month. Tech jobs won't go out of fashion for the next half century so minds as well get acclimated soon.
UDACITY and Codecademy are good FREE places to learn. Take the opportunity.
If you think free education is hard then…. ok I really want to know whats easy.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 04:50:03
We can get jobs here in America without a family connection……only problem is those jobs pay far below the cost of living
Feb 22, 2013 @ 14:23:49
Leonardo, I couldnt agree more. I didn't mean to say that we should switch back to socialism, or communism, I was trying to say that this system does not work, at least not for the "small" people. It is great in theory and was working just fine in for example protestant countries where people were actually investing profits in new capital. and not because of their connections in govrnment to buy the company that was owned by the state and then instead of investing in it, the main part of the profits they keep for themselves.. Croatia has too many war profiteers who are not prosecuted :/
Feb 27, 2013 @ 08:06:42
That is happening in Montenegro too..we even don't have free elections here…we only have corrupted criminal criminogenic authorities…
Feb 27, 2013 @ 15:12:22
This is happening all over and we are all going through the same thing. I completely agree with Petra. She made a good point about how the system is not working. So they need to come to a realization that their corrupt ways are not working and change within themselves. Even in the U.S.A,many college graduates can't find jobs and are in debt with huge amounts of loans they took to get through school. Something went wrong along the lines somewhere and we have to fix it!
Mar 08, 2013 @ 15:21:51
Bulgaria was the same, we had everything for free when I was kid, dentists, doctors, education, schoolbooks, kindergartens, it was more peaceful and calm, no fear no bullshit media …
Apr 14, 2013 @ 11:08:19
also in the Philippines
Apr 14, 2013 @ 11:25:20
Does not happening here in Prague. Get a degree in Computer Science and to find a well paid job is pretty easy task.
Apr 14, 2013 @ 11:25:20
Does not happening here in Prague. Get a degree in Computer Science and to find a well paid job is pretty easy task.
Apr 25, 2013 @ 22:04:55
I hear you all yes its the same in Canada for sure we are goin down hill fast! one thing I did to change my circumstances is started my own business and if your seriously intrested I can help you change your life. I am in control of my financial destiny and want others to feel the same empowerment and not go on our ecconomy but actually making your own ecconomy..Bob Proctor is a mogal fortune 500 tallent in personal development and Ive had the chance to train aside him. anyway this is hard times for alot of people and yes its the NWO, and its very scary times. peace and love to all.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 15:36:51
Awesome…"Case History"……Does anybody appreciate Actual Case Study History?
Feb 14, 2013 @ 16:43:35
Same here in Bulgaria, Pawel….. The only difference is most people think it is way better in Poland or Croatia
On a more cheerful note, I have been in four countries that do not exist any more (USSR, Chzechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and East Germany) and I actually had fun in them all.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 17:11:13
Thanks you guy's for chim' in in ! dialogue is a awesome thing and so is the study of actual case History…..it does keep you personal "Impressions" in lined with the "Truth"….and guards against "Censorships"….
Feb 14, 2013 @ 17:11:13
Thanks you guy's for chim' in in ! dialogue is a awesome thing and so is the study of actual case History…..it does keep you personal "Impressions" in lined with the "Truth"….and guards against "Censorships"….
Feb 14, 2013 @ 16:23:00
you cannot keep a good person down for long Petra, keep fighting.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 17:06:08
Petra is probably just having a bad day, she will cheer up and keep on living tomorrow. But the thing is more and more young people around start thinking a system with universal guaranteed employment and education, free healthcare and guaranteed minimum access to social benefits was not that bad after all. Even at the cost of lack of free elections.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 18:19:30
Capitalism and democracy are not synonymous! What's the point in having the right to vote with no-one to vote for? Democratic Socialism is possible!
Feb 14, 2013 @ 18:19:30
Capitalism and democracy are not synonymous! What's the point in having the right to vote with no-one to vote for? Democratic Socialism is possible!
Feb 14, 2013 @ 19:22:21
Is it easier for the people to influence an unelected government, or an entrenched economic oligarchy? Is there any real reason to prefer one over the other? I want government to have the power to control the oligarchy, and allocate the resources created by the society equitably to all its people. Elections are no substitute for freedom, do not guarantee freedom, and do not define freedom. Or, even more importantly, justice. If they are used to weaken government to the point that it cannot prevent the abuse by the economic oligarchy, they actually work against justice and freedom.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 19:58:44
George, you have no idea what I meant by this.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 21:38:26
I am not hving a bad day, I am having a bad life because our governemnt is inacapable of doing any good for the people. They make law for themseles. So they can steal more, have more power and money. I didnt mean to say it was all gopd during the socialistic Yugoslavia, or that I think the yugoslavia should get a second chance. I don't wan another alliance with serbia, slovenia, etc. I just wanted to say that capitalism isn't good for most pople.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 01:26:19
Conchúr MácCárthaigh Couldn't agree more !
Feb 15, 2013 @ 16:51:47
lol, he he no idea, period!
Apr 15, 2013 @ 05:09:05
I totally agree with Jim Pivonka, you speak my mind…the goverment should have the ultimate power to control the oligarchy not vise versa…
Feb 14, 2013 @ 19:05:16
Palestine ?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 03:49:38
Palestine is more of a country now than it ever was before. Prior to WWII it was a British protectorate and before that part of the Ottoman Empire, Palestine never gained its pseudo independence until the formation of modern Israel.
Feb 14, 2013 @ 19:05:16
Ugh, why isn't Palestine on there?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 03:44:05
Palestine is more of a country than it ever was before. Prior to WWII it was a British protectorate and before that part of the Ottoman Empire, Palestine never gained its pseudo independence until the formation of modern Israel.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 04:29:18
So India wasn't really a country bc of the UK? When would you consider Canada and Australia a country?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 04:29:18
So India wasn't really a country bc of the UK? When would you consider Canada and Australia a country?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:56:05
Well first Palestine is still a country, so it by definition can't be on the list. Second India wasn't really a country under Britain because it had no autonomy; Canada is completely independent from the U.K. and has been since the early 80s, so yes; Australia is (as far as I know) independent from the U.K. for all intents and purposes, just not technically, so again yes.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 07:05:28
Is not a country.
http://geography.about.com/od/politicalgeography/a/palestinenot.htm
Feb 16, 2013 @ 04:26:06
there is only fragments left……
Feb 20, 2013 @ 04:58:07
michael is right, before britain controlled palestine, the ottomons did and before that any number of different arab nations controlled it.. so technically it never existed… *pro palestine here btw
Feb 20, 2013 @ 10:08:14
Andrew – Canada 1867 and Australia 1901 – the years they ceased being British colonies and had their own constitution.
Mar 06, 2013 @ 00:48:29
When was there ever a nation called palestine? Right, never.
Mar 14, 2013 @ 11:41:36
Never was a country. It was a province under the Ottomans, then a mandate under the British then nominally a country but with no defined territory that everybody recognizes, which is a situation that remains until today.
Apr 14, 2013 @ 12:16:08
The topic is "Top Countries that Disappeared in the 20TH CENTURY".
Apr 14, 2013 @ 13:09:33
you are just sionistic pig
Feb 14, 2013 @ 21:24:13
How could Egypt, Sudan & Palestine have gone to England? England is but a constituent part of the U.K., and today the only part without its own government. It hasn't been a political state since 1707 and its union with Scotland, strange error considering your subject.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 03:49:02
During the period between the World Wars and immediately after WWII before Ireland gained independence the state was between being called Great Britain/Britain and U.K. During this time it was simply called England, and England controlled Whales, Scotland, and Ireland, and a dozen or so other places around the globe.
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:22:11
do u understand what is in Westminster ?
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:23:34
Michael Foley that i scompleat horse shit u really have to look up the act of union both or ur history teachers should be fired
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:27:54
Michael Foley and dont ever suggest my country was just apart of England. until 1707 Scotland was an independent country and after 1707 together as great Britain in different forms but never as England owning or completely controlling any of the other country's with in the uk
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:30:15
Michael Foley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_Union_1707
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:30:48
bynn is not even worth arguing with
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:32:16
Michael Foley the island the country's with in the uk sits on is called grate Britain
Feb 16, 2013 @ 19:34:11
Michael Foley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_Union_1800
Feb 15, 2013 @ 04:02:56
Some of the comments on here scare me by advocating a return to socialism. Be cautious, guaranteed employment, free healthcare, and other nationalized services are a double edge sword. They may make the situation better in the short run (highly emphasizing may), but in the long run they stun advancement, and hurt overall quality.
The government by having no competition has no need to provide a better product/service as long as it is doing an acceptable job for its citizens.
America did not become the greatest country the world has ever seen by being Socialist in any way. Ever since the implementation of the "Great Society" by one of our most socialist president, Johnson, the rest of the world has started to catch up to our standard of living. Now we are on a path toward socialism with the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), and if history repeats itself, our future looks bleak. We had the best healthcare in the world, we paid more for it, but in my opinion it was worth it. I pray to God that Texas remains strong in its conservative/libertarian principles and that if the day comes when we have to fight against socialism/communism that more states will stand with it.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 04:05:26
I know that many of the people leaving the comments I was addressing don't live in the United States, but take our example of unprecedented growth (particularly in the 1920s under near complete market freedom) and gradual decline since the 1960s as a lesson to be learned.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 09:03:44
Let us all pray to God the commies remain too busy sorting out their own lives in Europe and not come to the proud state of Texas to deprive you of your constitutional right to vote and bear firearms.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 17:15:11
Mr, Foley, some of the comments on here scare you? GOOD, be scared. FYI, America is a socialist country, but only socialist towards corporations and not ordinary people. It's called "Corporatism", the logical endpoint of Capitalism. What enabled the rest of the world catching up to USA are: the manufacturing and technology being supported by their governments, a gradual building up of their education level, and their determination not to be exploited by the western neo-colonialism. Plus they are not spending 60% of their income towards world domination, which is simply not paying off as it used to anymore. The enormous advantage of having grabbed a continent whole with all the natural resources and building an empire on it based on slave labor and then global exploitation backed by militarism, could only carry America so far. Last resort of printing fiat money will not save the hollow American economy much longer. As it's known, "being unsustainable, NO empire lasts forever"! But considering America is an extension of the British Empire, the WASPs had a pretty good run already. Now comes the fun part. Oh, fun for the rest of the world, not the wasp-empire
Feb 15, 2013 @ 17:35:50
I will give you that our government is becoming increasingly corporatist, but unfortunately it is the politicians that put up a facade of advocating social justice (which I don't support either), like President Obama, Senator Harry Reid, and Representative Nancy Pelosi (I'm not sure if you're familiar with American politicians) that are the biggest offenders.
However, we are not a land empire like it seems you are implying, all American territory in North America is rightly and justly part of the United States. Where I will give you credit is in criticism of our military defense of our financial/economic global empire. The fact that our economic empire exists is not the problem, it is the military defense of it that is.
Our over use of our military is only part of what is bankrupting us though, it is more our social welfare programs and our government's near abandonment of the "build yourself at the expense of your back" attitude that made America great in the first place.
Then comes fiat currency. We do have a problem, but America doesn't even break the surface of the worst currency abuse. The title clearly goes to China, but there are others that are much worse than the U.S. such as Russia, France, Spain, Greece, Japan, etc. In fact I'd expect that the most of the E.U's abuse of fiat currency will destroy it (along with its seeming disdain for manufacturing) when the U.K. and Germany finally get sick of carrying the rest of the countries in it.
As far as America being an extension of the British Empire, that is completely false. We unfortunately made many of the same decisions as the British, getting into land wars in southern Asia and now Africa, but we arrived in the situation completely independently, and for somewhat different reasons: the British did it to gain economic influence, while America is doing it to protect the influence we already had.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 17:38:06
George Stefanov I hope I don't sense sarcasm in your comment, but if it is sincere it is much appreciated.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 05:10:02
You have no idea. America does not have the best health care system in the world. There is no such thing as a free market.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 05:14:48
The American Capitalistic society is like a cancer to the rest of the world and the non wealthy Americans as well. Even though I am an American I agree with what George and Kali say. America has great health care FOR THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD IT; the rest of the country is left to suffer in horrible pain and die of 100% curable diseases. EVERYTHING in America is built upon and based upon GREED! Our corporations are so money hungry they outsource jobs to foreign countries who do not have rules and policies for keeping employees safe; that is why other countries are "catching up" to us. America calls herself a "Christian" nation yet a lot of our laws, policies and additions to our Constitution are Anti-Christian; they say the exact opposite of what Jesus taught. America is the Babylon whore that Revelations talks about and her corruption and greed is what will destroy her. Becoming a "socialist" country (read your Bible, Jesus IS A SOCIALIST!) is the only hope for America to survive; otherwise she will implode from her gluttonous greed.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 05:14:48
The American Capitalistic society is like a cancer to the rest of the world and the non wealthy Americans as well. Even though I am an American I agree with what George and Kali say. America has great health care FOR THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD IT; the rest of the country is left to suffer in horrible pain and die of 100% curable diseases. EVERYTHING in America is built upon and based upon GREED! Our corporations are so money hungry they outsource jobs to foreign countries who do not have rules and policies for keeping employees safe; that is why other countries are "catching up" to us. America calls herself a "Christian" nation yet a lot of our laws, policies and additions to our Constitution are Anti-Christian; they say the exact opposite of what Jesus taught. America is the Babylon whore that Revelations talks about and her corruption and greed is what will destroy her. Becoming a "socialist" country (read your Bible, Jesus IS A SOCIALIST!) is the only hope for America to survive; otherwise she will implode from her gluttonous greed.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 11:30:52
when did socialism in Europe post WW2 ever interfere with progress? If anything, the desire to be more capitalist has interfered with Europe. Witness the latest encounter with horse meat in the beef. This would NEVER HAVE HAPPENED about 20 years ago when everyone in Europe was opposed to Americanization. What exactly has capitalization brought the world in terms of benefits? There has to be a middle road.
Feb 27, 2013 @ 04:09:40
is cold war over yet? usa has eased socialising the production tools the upper classes wouldnt share with work classes: investment. they even tried to go international with it. Just as karl marx advised! in the end, may capitalism and socialism lead toward prosperous civilisations and similar humanities, or does american self-centered caricatures strictly forbid considering any other way to manage humans than through individualised incentives? Systems are not the problem here, as any of them can guarantee no one would fail them.
Mar 14, 2013 @ 12:01:36
Ok Anti-Americanism will always get a 'like' from the (often inferiority complex driven) masses, but try not to make factual statements if you do not know the actual facts. Firstly – that is not corporatism, even if it does exist in the US, google it. Secondly the rest of the world is 'catching up' (albeit slowly and only in certain areas) because information disseminates and the 'leader' in technology etc must create more which is always slower than merely copying from others. A well known economic fact – its the reason the growth rate for developing countries is so much higher than that of developed. Thirdly, the US government is a massive contributes to technological growth, but claiming even the rest of the world combined is starting to catch up with the US in that regard (and educationally) is just laughable when you look at actual statistics – the US accounts for 60% of world scientific output, 70 of the top 100 unis in the world are in the US. More Nobel prize winners in Science and medicine come from the US than the rest of the world combined. Fourthly – you can check how much the US spends on its military – its more like 4.5% of its GDP and falling rapidly, not anywhere near 60%. Which is less than average, by the way. Its dominance militarly, however, is far from being eroded. Fifthly – every major society in the world at one stage was a slave state, the US had far less than a continent when it stopped being one, it was one of the first to abolish it and is the main cause of momentum for its end elsewhere, if it globaly expanded through militarism the world would look like a very different place – for example it did not even take part at all in the biggest expansion of all- the colonisation of Africa.
Just FYI Im Irish in Ireland I just like facts over the hissy fitting of third worlders ashamed of their own societies inability to compete. Its embarrassing really, particularly when I see it on the internet (American invented through its predecessor ARPAnet) on a compute screen (American invented) typed ona keyboard no doubt (you guessed it). Ill take your no doubt third world society more seriously when it begins contributing on even nearly the same scale. Until then Its just another underachiever trying desperately to convince themselves the over achiever is not special.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:40:19
How about Palestine?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:51:20
Palestine is more of a country now than it ever was before. Prior to WWII it was a British protectorate and before that part of the Ottoman Empire, Palestine never gained its pseudo independence until the formation of modern Israel. Palestine is still there, it isn't gone yet.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:56:11
Israel is there and a Palestinians live like prisoners in their own country.They don't even have basic human rights no hope, no life it's an absolute shame……Israel is a lunatic terror state.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:56:11
Israel is there and a Palestinians live like prisoners in their own country.They don't even have basic human rights no hope, no life it's an absolute shame……Israel is a lunatic terror state.
Mar 06, 2013 @ 01:56:24
The USA is supporting that terror and has itself terrorized me, so I am leaving for Ukraine in early June.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 06:40:19
How about Palestine?
Feb 15, 2013 @ 10:56:05
Just a correction; UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC was not from 1958 to 1971, it was from 1958 to 1961.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 12:19:03
Completely wrong on Tibet. A very complicated situation but Tibet's independence goes back to the seventh century and they were never subsumed into China until 1959. When it suited the Nations of the world to deny it ever existed.
Feb 15, 2013 @ 17:20:47
"Top 10 Countries" is a misnomer. Some of the political entities above are empires and/or amalgamate federations that included multiple countries that never disappeared. I thought it's going to be a serious, interesting article like Hittites, Aztec, Sumerians, Khazar, etc.
Feb 16, 2013 @ 04:21:30
I like the fact that the Armenian Genocide was not mentioned at all in the Turkish bit. (Please note the sarcasm dripping from my post.)
Feb 16, 2013 @ 04:24:18
where is Palestine………..
Feb 16, 2013 @ 04:24:18
where is Palestine………..
Feb 16, 2013 @ 11:06:55
hey why even have borders there only made for the people who love controll its so stupid!
Feb 16, 2013 @ 14:08:16
Article needs proofreading. Author misspelled the name of #1. DOh!
Feb 17, 2013 @ 14:34:23
Dude I'm an Indian and am going to take offense at your slighting of Sikkim. Yes they do have roads there and its a wonderful place to visit with great scenic beauty.
Feb 20, 2013 @ 07:15:58
That's why we need no countries, no goverment, and an RBE system. Watch Zeigtgeis / Venus Project.
Feb 21, 2013 @ 02:22:12
My snob Historian perspective.
10. Shit hole
9. Full of culture, just on the wrong place on the map. If they werent surrounded by so many aggressive states in the late 1800s early 1900s I think they could have greater prospered.
8. Shit hole*10
7. Shit hole *100 (Had to bring down others with it as well).
6. Awesome sets of ideas, too bad they have no hard power or allies with hard power to back up their awesome ideas.
5. Not sure?
4. Not sure?
3. It was horrible as an empire and perhaps worse now.
2. Not sure?
1. In my mind it was never a "legit" state.
I apologize that my limited amount of knowledge has limited the amount I could contribute to the discussion, reactions comments are welcome.
Feb 21, 2013 @ 22:16:37
I was born and raised in Slovakia, we visit our family and friends there 2-3 times a year and I have never met a single Slovak who is sorry about the split. Slovaks have been dominated by someone for over 1000 years. Everyone had their turn, Hungary, Nazi Germany, USSR, Czechs. Slovaks were tired of being the bitch of Central Europe. Even the so called Czech brothers concentrated heavy industry, arts and sciences in Bohemia and Moravia, the two states that make up Czech Republic and Slovakia was an agricultural region, the peasantry. So the question is, do you remain under the wing of another dragon, or do you strike out on your own even if it means you will be poor? Slovaks made their choice, people are doing better than before although still one of the poorest in Europe, but they also have one of the lowest debt to income ratios in Europe. Bitches no more, bitches;).
Feb 22, 2013 @ 08:20:22
You might want to add Palestine to this list as well.
http://mondoweiss.net/images/2012/07/Maps.jpg
Feb 28, 2013 @ 02:23:38
The small country created after the breaking of Yugoslavia is NOT called Macedonia as stated in the text GOD DAMMIT… It is called FYROM… Macedonia is a Greek state!
Mar 13, 2013 @ 21:07:57
No its NOT – 70% percent of the people there are etnich bulgarians!!!!!!!!!
Mar 13, 2013 @ 22:25:52
you really make laugh. Learn english first and then we can talk!
Mar 08, 2013 @ 15:11:55
OTTOMAN EMPIRE, 1299-1922 THIS IS SO FUCKING INCORRECT INFORMATION.
Bulgaria was founded in 681 AD And we are still here… and what kind of period is this 1299 – 1922 this is fucking outrageous.
And the author of this bullshit doesn't know anything about History facts, what about the first and 2nd Balkan wars… happened 1912 – 1914 and from 1916-1018… all Balkans country according to this miss leading article haven't existed….
And Soviet Union wasn't a country.. it was a fuckin` union….
Mar 13, 2013 @ 20:29:40
ottoman had kept bulgarian in the hands for 400 years.You are week people so you cant forget Turkish cock.
Mar 13, 2013 @ 21:01:41
So far so good. but the occupation construct GDR was never was a country! Just as little as the FRG is one.
Apr 14, 2013 @ 13:06:39
first, who write this, must learn mor history, yugoslavi never was under the hitler control, soo patetic view of west historical falsificat, west europa is the best and we must doing what they say, fuk you west imperalisam propagand, and fuk new world order.long live to anonimus, sorry for my selfslerned english.
Apr 15, 2013 @ 00:34:29
Kurdistan was also wiped in the 20th century twice,
Once by the British and once by Iran.
Apr 25, 2013 @ 19:25:53
Who forgot Ceylon?
Apr 26, 2013 @ 17:11:41
You forgot rhodesia. That was the great country.