NASA Future Aircraft Will be a REVOLUTION !

NASA Future Aircraft Will be a REVOLUTION !

An airliner means a device used to carry passengers on a commercial basis. They are most often operated by airlines that own or lease. They serve the regular lines or are chartered to transport groups starting to commercial airports.

The vast majority of online service aircraft are designed exclusively for these types of uses, but in the first half of the twentieth century they were often developed from military aircraft bomber-type or transportation. Many are also available in freighter to transport cargo or passengers-cargo combined version. Old appliances sold on the used market are often converted for freight transport. Some devices have been built for the transportation of persons (heads of state) are used as a business aircraft or know military applications (troop transport, refueling, etc.).

Video credit: NASA

The True Cost of Cheap Clothing

The True Cost of Cheap Clothing

The True Cost is a documentary about the clothing industry’s impact on the world, particularly its horrendous working conditions and poverty wages for its employees and its devastating toll on the environment. “The price of clothing has been decreasing for decades, while the human and environmental costs have grown dramatically,” says the film.

The rise of fast fashion has garnered a lot of attention lately. EcoWatch’s article last month,Who’s Really Paying for Our Clothes, was wildly popular. John Oliver also addressed fast fashion last month, in which he sends a hilarious, yet powerful message to CEOs of fashion companies.

The film, which debuts on Friday, is riding a wave of heightened concern over where our clothes come from. Directed by Andrew Morgan and produced by Michael Ross, the film takes viewers all over the world, “From the brightest runways to the darkest slums,” and features interviews with the some of the world’s premier thought leaders, including Stella McCartney, Livia Firth and Vandana Shiva.

Watch the trailer here:

This article was written by:  and first appeared on Eco Watch


How ‘Spontaneous’ Social Norms Emerge

How ‘Spontaneous’ Social Norms Emerge


Fifteen years ago, the name “Aiden” was hardly on the radar of Americans with new babies. It ranked a lowly 324th on the Social Security Administration’s list of popular baby names. But less than a decade later, the name became a favorite, soaring into the top 20 for five years and counting.

While some may attribute its popularity to a “Sex in the City” character, a new study led by the University of Pennsylvania’s Damon Centola provides a scientific explanation for how social conventions – everything from acceptable baby names to standards of professional conduct – can emerge suddenly, seemingly out of nowhere, with no external forces driving their creation.

The research used an original Web-based experiment to test whether and how large populations come to consensus. The findings have implications for everything from understanding why different regions of the country have distinct words for the same product — soda versus pop, for example — to explaining how norms regarding civil rights gained widespread traction in the United States.

“Our study explains how certain ideas and behaviors can gain a foothold and, all of a sudden, emerge as big winners,” Centola said. “It is a common misconception that this process depends upon some kind of leader, or centralized media source, to coordinate a population.  We show that it can depend on nothing more than the normal interactions of people in social networks.”

Centola is an associate professor in Penn’s Annenberg School for Communication and the School of Engineering and Applied Science and is director of the Network Dynamics Group at Penn. He partnered on the work with physicist Andrea Baronchelli, an assistant professor at City University London.

To understand how social norms arise, Centola and Baronchelli invented a Web-based game, which recruited participants from around the World Wide Web using online advertisements. In each round of the “Name Game,” participants were paired, shown a photograph of a human face and asked to give it a name. If both players provided the same name, they won a small amount of money. If they failed, they lost a small amount and saw their partner’s name suggestion. The game continued with new partners for as many as 40 rounds.

Though the basic structure of the game remained the same throughout the experiment, the researchers wanted to see whether changing the way that players interacted with one another would affect the ability of the group to come to consensus.

They began with a game of 24 players, each of whom was assigned a particular position within an online “social network.” The participants, however, weren’t aware of their position, didn’t know who they were playing with or even how many other players were in the game.

Centola and Baronchelli tested the effects of three different types of networks.

In the “geographical network” version, players interacted repeatedly with their four closest neighbors in a spatial neighborhood. In the “small world network” game, participants still played with only four other players, but the partners were chosen randomly from around the network. And in the “random mixing” version, players were not limited to four other partners, instead playing each new round with a new partner selected at random from all the participants.

As the games proceeded, the researchers observed clear patterns in people’s behavior that distinguished the different networks.

In the geographical and small world network games, participants easily coordinated with their neighbors, but they were not able to settle on one overall “winning” name for the population. Instead, a few competing names emerged as popular options: Sarah, Elena, Charlene and Julie all vying for dominance, for instance, with no global agreement.

In the first few rounds of the random mixing game, on the other hand, it first appeared that no winner would ever emerge, as players suggested name after name, trying to match their latest partners’ choices, with very little hope of success.

Yet within just a handful of rounds, everyone agreed on a single name.

“Consensus spontaneously emerged from nothing,” Centola said. “At first it was chaos, everyone was saying different things and no one could coordinate, and then all of a sudden people who had never interacted with each other were all using the same words.”

The experimental results match nicely onto the researchers’ mathematical model of how network structure might influence the process of social coordination. The model predicted that random mixing would allow one name choice to take off and become a big winner, a concept that in physics is known as symmetry breaking.

“We were shocked at how closely human behavior matched our models,” Centola said. “But we were also nervous. It worked so perfectly the first time that we were afraid it was a fluke!”

Yet the results remained the same no matter if the game was played with 24, 48 or 96 players.

The researchers note that the consistency of the findings during repeated experiments suggests that their theory would likely scale up indefinitely – explaining, for example, how social conventions form even in very large groups like nations.

The findings also show that the process of consensus building can be manipulated by adjusting how participants in the process interact with one another.

“By making simple changes to a social network, the members of a population become more likely to spontaneously agree on a social norm,” Centola said.

Such a finding might be of interest to marketers or policy makers attempting to get a particular product or behavior to surge in popularity, or political candidates hoping to soar in the polls.

In their next project, the researchers want to tweak their experiments to see how a few coordinated individuals, which Centola terms “committed minorities,” can flip the global consensus from one norm to another.

“We would like to know how small the committed minority can be, yet still instigate widespread social change,” he said. “It’s a question that a lot of people would like to know the answer to.”

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Pennsylvania. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Humans Need Not Apply

Humans Need Not Apply

This video combines two thoughts to reach an alarming conclusion: “Technology gets better, cheaper, and faster at a rate biology can’t match” + “Economics always wins” = “Automation is inevitable.”

That’s why it’s important to emphasize again this stuff isn’t science fiction. The robots are here right now. There is a terrifying amount of working automation in labs and warehouses that is proof of concept.

We have been through economic revolutions before, but the robot revolution is different.

Horses aren’t unemployed now because they got lazy as a species, they’re unemployable. There’s little work a horse can do that pays for its housing and hay.

And many bright, perfectly capable humans will find themselves the new horse: unemployable through no fault of their own.

Spain’s Ancient Villages Up For Sale

Spain’s Ancient Villages Up For Sale

Hundreds of rural villages around Galicia in Spain are frozen in time, long-abandoned by their residents. But there are hopes that the current financial crisis could actually help revive the ruins.

“It’s the biggest sadness you can imagine. It’s sad that it’s abandoned in this way”, says Jose Collazo, the last resident of a ghost village. In recession-hit Spain there are almost 3,000 abandoned villages. With an ageing population and almost 25% unemployment, local governments are desperate for any boost to their economy. Whole villages are now up for sale, and locals hope that foreign buyers might boost the depressed economy. At a time when many Spaniards feel that capitalism has failed them, the rural idyll of self-sufficiency has never seemed so attractive.

If Ever You Were Confused About Evolution, Here’s An Answer To Your Every Question

If Ever You Were Confused About Evolution, Here’s An Answer To Your Every Question

The mechanisms of evolution explained in one video.

The theory of evolution explains how the enormous variety of life could come into existence. How it is possible for primitive life forms to spawn the millions of different creatures, that exist today. Unfortunately, evolution is often misunderstood, because it’s mechanisms seem counter intuitive. By using visualizations, infographics and appealing characters, the viewer is more likely to understand it the complex information. More than that, by presenting the information in an entertaining way, the information is more likely to sink in.

Short videos, explaining things. For example Evolution, the Universe, Stock Market or controversial topics like Fracking. Because we love science.

We would love to interact more with you, our viewers to figure out what topics you want to see. If you have a suggestion for future videos or feedback, drop us a line! 🙂